HB 588, 75th R.S.
Relating to uniform admission and reporting procedures for institutions of higher education.
Report to the Governor, the Lieutenant Governor, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives on the implementation of Tex. S.B. 175, 81st Leg., R.S. (automatic admission/10 percent rule). Ranking up by moving out: the effect of the Texas Top 10% Plan on property values. Abigail Noel Fisher and Rachel Multer Michalewicz v. University of Texas at Austin et al.; Order, judgment (No. 1:08-cv-00263, affirmative action, consideration of race in University of Texas admissions). The top 10% law and its impact on The University of Texas at Austin. Implementation and results of the Texas automatic admissions law at The University of Texas at Austin: Demographic analysis of entering freshmen, fall 2008; Academic performance of top 10% and non-top 10% students, academic years 2003-2007 (Tex. H.B. 588, 75th Leg., R.S.). Affirmative action and the Texas top 10% percent admission law: balancing equity and access to higher education. The state of college admission. Report of the Task Force on Enrollment Strategy. Closing the gap?: admissions and enrollments at the Texas public flagships before and after affirmative action. Small number of high schools produces half of students at U. of Texas at Austin. Imperfect 10. Eyeing campus diversity. Coloring the campus. Affirmative action: making the case. New book from ACE [American Council on Education] a primer. Colleges should take 'confirmative action' in admissions. Strict scrutiny of facially race-neutral state action and the Texas Ten Percent Plan. Critics blast plan to expand class-rank policy in Texas as affirmative-action ploy. Hispanics and higher education: more questions than answers. Ten percent in Texas: the jury is still out on an alternative to affirmative action. The Texas test case: integrating America's colleges. The SAT and the American dream: UC president pleased by changes. Bush asks Supreme Court to strike down U. of Michigan's affirmative-action policy. What's at stake: in the competitive world of college admissions, 'fairness' is often in the eye of the beholder. Here are the facts about affirmative action. Curves, swerves, and surges ahead: AASCU/NASULGC report predicts challenges of coming decade. 'Percent plans' don't add up: analysis of California, Florida, and Texas admissions programs indicates that their impact is less than advertised. Percent plans: admissions of failure. What's the place of race? Symposium: affirmative action in higher education. The affirmative action debate. Affirmative action front and center. Affirmative action: Texas alternative gets mixed reviews. Reports cite alternatives to race-conscious admissions. How I learned to love quotas: as the Supreme Court prepares to rule on the fate of affirmative action, a former skeptic makes a plea in its defense. Ten percent plan in Texas. Major shifts in college admissions policies in Texas had unforeseen consequences. Role of race in UT admissions challenged again. Texas move to tighten GPA formula sparks backlash. Since when are good grades and diversity a bad thing? 7 recommendations and the Texas top ten percent plan. Flagships, feeders, and the Texas top 10% law: a test of the 'brain drain' hypothesis. Implementation and results of the Texas automatic admissions law (HB 588) at The University of Texas at Austin: Demographic analysis of entering freshmen, fall 2008; Academic performance of top 10% and non-top 10% students, academic years 2003-2007. Policy transparency and college enrollment: did the Texas top 10% law broaden access to the public flagships? State of college admission report. Equity, diversity and college admissions: lessons from the Texas uniform admission law. Beyond admissions: re-thinking college opportunities and outcomes. Percent plans, automatic admissions, and college enrollment outcomes. |
The Legislative Archive System is a work in progress. Complete information is not available for all bills and all sessions. Visit the Legislative Archive System status page for details. Please contact the Legislative Reference Library at 512-463-1252 if you have any questions.
Information on this website is provided as a public service by the Legislative Reference Library. The Legislative Reference Library makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy and makes no warranty in regard to its use. Users assume all risk of reliance on the information included on this site.