HBA-EDN H.B. 1860 77(R) BILL ANALYSIS Office of House Bill AnalysisH.B. 1860 By: Turner, Sylvester Criminal Jurisprudence 4/12/2001 Introduced BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE For the last ten years Texas has led the nation in the number of individuals executed, some of whom were 17 years of age at the time of conviction. Many states that impose the death penalty do allow individuals who were 17 years of age at the time of conviction to be sentenced to death, but most of these states require some level of review by a judge to determine the defendant's level of maturity at the time of the commission of the offense. Texas is one of a few states that does not require such a review. Throughout the statutes, individuals 17 years of age are regarded as children, and an individual is not considered to be an adult until that individual reaches 18 years of age. There is some concern that individuals who were younger than 18 years of age at the time of the commission of their offense may not have been sufficiently mature to understand the consequences of their actions and should not be sentenced to death without a review of their level of maturity at the time of the offense. House Bill 1860 requires a court, if the state intends to seek the death penalty for an individual who was younger than 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense, to hold a hearing to determine whether the defendant was sufficiently mature at the time of the offense to understand the consequences of their actions. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY It is the opinion of the Office of House Bill Analysis that this bill does not expressly delegate any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution. ANALYSIS House Bill 1860 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to require a court, if the state intends to seek the death penalty for a defendant who was younger than 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense, to hold a hearing to determine whether a defendant was sufficiently mature to understand the consequences of the defendant's actions at the time of the commission of the offense. The bill requires the court to order the defendant to submit to an examination by court-appointed experts to determine the defendant's mental and emotional maturity at the time of the commission of the offense. The bill authorizes evidence to be presented at the time of sentencing as to whether the defendant was sufficiently mature. H.B. 1860 modifies the court's instructions to a jury for a case in which evidence from an examination of the defendant by court-appointed experts has raised the issue of whether the defendant was sufficiently mature. EFFECTIVE DATE September 1, 2001.