HBA-JEK H.B. 3473 77(R)BILL ANALYSIS


Office of House Bill AnalysisH.B. 3473
By: Naishtat
Civil Practices
7/25/2001
Enrolled



BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 

Current law requires a person who has cause to believe that a child is
being abused or neglected to immediately report the abuse or neglect.
However, law prior to the 77th Legislature did not protect a person who
reported child abuse or neglect or participated in an investigation
regarding child abuse or neglect from retaliation by an employer.  House
Bill 3473 prohibits an employer from terminating or suspending the
employment of or otherwise discriminating against a professional who has
direct contact with children in the course of employment and who in good
faith reports child abuse or neglect or cooperates with an investigation
regarding child abuse or neglect. 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

It is the opinion of the Office of House Bill Analysis that this bill does
not expressly delegate any additional rulemaking authority to a state
officer, department, agency, or institution. 

ANALYSIS

House Bill 3473 amends the Family Code to prohibit an employer from
suspending or terminating the employment of or otherwise discriminating
against a professional who works with children and who in good faith
initiates or cooperates with a child abuse or neglect investigation or
reports child abuse or neglect to the person's supervisor, an administrator
of the facility where the person is employed, a state regulatory agency, or
a law enforcement agency.   

H.B. 3473 authorizes a person who is suspended or terminated or otherwise
discriminated against under this provision to sue for injunctive relief and
damages, including actual damages, damages for mental anguish, court costs,
reasonable attorney's fees, and if the employer is a private employer,
exemplary damages.  The bill authorizes the plaintiff to sue in a district
or county court of the county in which the plaintiff conducts business or
was employed by the defendant.  The bill provides that a plaintiff who
prevails is entitled to reinstatement to the plaintiff's former position,
reinstatement of any fringe benefits, and compensation for lost wages.  The
bill provides that it is an affirmative defense to a suit that an employer
would have taken the action against the employee for a reason not related
to the fact that the employee reported child abuse or neglect or initiated
or cooperated with an investigation or proceeding relating to an allegation
of child abuse or neglect.   

The bill authorizes a public employee to sue the employing state or local
governmental entity for relief for retaliation and sets forth compensatory
damage limits.  The bill prohibits a public employee who has a cause of
action related to protection for reporting violations of law from bringing
an action under the provisions of the bill.  The bill does not apply to a
person who reports the person's own abuse or neglect of a child or who
initiates or cooperates with an investigation or proceeding by a
governmental entity relating to an allegation of the person's own abuse or
neglect of a child. 

EFFECTIVE DATE

September 1, 2001.