Related documents Search history | Help
[ clip Abortion funds fight on in Texas, opponents plan new fronts two years after Dobbs decision ]
9 document(s) related
Texas Bills & Amendments: 2
Misc. items: 7
| Texas Bills / Amendments | Caption | Clips |
|---|---|---|
| 87th Regular Session | ||
| HB 1280 | Relating to prohibition of abortion; providing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense. | 246 |
| SB 8 | Relating to abortion, including abortions after detection of an unborn child's heartbeat; authorizing a private civil right of action. | 879 |
|
Federal and State Bills
|
Clips |
|
|---|---|---|
New Mexico Senate Bill 13, relating to health; protecting the privacy of providers, recipients and others engaging in reproductive and gender affirming health care; protecting providers, recipients, and others engaging in reproductive and gender-affirming health care from certain civil or criminal liability or professional disciplinary action; providing for enforcement; imposing penalties, prescribing relief. (Other State Bill) |
||
|
Laws & Rules
|
Clips |
|
Texas Penal Code Art. 1192, Furnishing the means (for abortion). (Link Type: Texas Law) |
7 | |
22 TAC §§165.7 - 165.9, Medical records (emergency exceptions to the state's abortion ban). (Link Type: Texas Rule) |
8 | |
|
Legal Documents
|
Clips |
|
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Opinion and concurring opinions (No. 23-0629, vacating the trial court's order; asserting that doctors who denied defendants' abortions for fear of civil penalties or criminal prosecution were “simply wrong in that legal assessment"; SB 8, abortion exemptions). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Opinion (No. 19-1392, overturn of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Food and Drug Administration, et al., v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al., and Danco Laboratories, LLC v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al.; Opinion (Nos. 23-235 and 23-236, plaintiff's lack standing to challenge FDA's actions regarding regulation of mifepristone). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Fund Texas Choice, et al. v. Ken Paxton, et al.; Order (No. 1:22-cv-859-RP, ruling that abortion laws in Texas don't regulate legal abortions in other states). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||