Subject search results

2 Document(s) [ Subject: Court Reporters Certification Board, Texas ]

• Committee:

  House Judicial Affairs, 76th R.S. (1999)

  Title:

  Interim report

  Document type:

  Report

  Subjects:

  Attorney General Child Support Division | Child support | Court reform | Court Reporters Certification Board, Texas | Drug courts | Drug rehabilitation programs | Hate crimes | Judicial districts | Judicial Districts Board | Judicial elections | Redistricting |

  Library Call Number:

  L1836.76 j899

  Description:

  [57 pages  File size: 3,049 kb]

  Charges:

  1. Study the need to revise Texas law on hate crimes.
  2. Review and assess the success of specialized drug courts in other states.
  3. Conduct a comprehensive review of the appellate court system, including issues related to the selection of appellate judges, judicial redistricting, efficiency of handling workload, overlapping appellate districts and forum shopping.
  4. Review the need for the Judicial Districts Board.
  5. Conduct active oversight of the agencies under the committee's jurisdiction.

  ---

• Committee:

  House Judiciary, 69th R.S. (1985)

  Title:

  Interim Report

  Document type:

  Report

  Subjects:

  Administrative Hearings, State Office of | Alternative dispute resolution | Court congestion | Court Reporters Certification Board, Texas | Divorce |

  Library Call Number:

  L1836.69 j898

  Description:

  [101 pages  File size: 3,277 kb]

  Charges:

  1. To study the funding procedures and processes of the Court Reporters Certification Board, and review the qualifications necessary for certification.
  2. To study the necessity and desirability of establishing or expanding a system of arbitration or mediation for certain civil cases.
  3. To study the necessity and desirability of allowing court ordered alimony in Texas, and the determination of those parameters of circumstances which would indicate a need for spousal maintenance.
  4. To study the advantages and disadvantages to the state of creating a central panel of administrative law judges.

  ---