Related documents Search history  | Help
[ clip Texas Supreme Court declines to clarify abortion ban in suit from 20 women who suffered emergencies ]
11 document(s) related
Misc. items: 11
Legal Documents
|
Clips |
|
---|---|---|
Amanda Zurawski, et al. v. State of Texas, et al.; Defendant's notice of accelerated interlocutory appeal (No. D-1-GN-23-000968, blocking temporary injunction against Texas abortion bans). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Amanda Zurawski, et al. v. State of Texas, et al.; Original petition (No. D-1-GN-23-000968, seeking declaratory judgment and application for a permanent injunction surrounding meaning to Texas's abortion bans). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Amanda Zurawski, et al. v. State of Texas, et al.; Plaintiff's second amended verified petition for declaratory judgement and application for temporary and permanent injunction (No. D-1-GN-23-000968, addition of further plaintiffs, Texas abortion bans). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Amanda Zurawski, et al. v. State of Texas, et al.; Plaintiffs' first amended verified petition for declaratory judgment and application for temporary and permanent injunction (No. D-1-GN-23-000968, asking for declaratory judgment and application for a permanent injunction surrounding meaning to Texas's abortion bans). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
Amanda Zurawski, Lauren Miller, Lauren Hall, Anna Zargarian, Ashley Brandt, et al. v. State of Texas et al.; Temporary injunction order (No. D-1-GN-23-000968, enforcement of Texas abortion bans in connection with 'emergent medical condition' temporarily suspended). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Brief amici curiae on behalf of New York et al. in support of appellees (No. 23-0629, requesting to vacate district court's temporary injunction, signed by twenty states and one district). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Brief amicus curiae on behalf of members of the Texas State Legislature in support of defendants (No. 23-0629, arguing abortion restrictions should be decided by the Legislature; drafted by Texas Alliance for Life Trust Fund, signed by 10 senators and 80 representatives). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Brief for amici curiae Bumble Inc. and other businesses and businesspeople in support of appellees (No. 23-0629, affirming bipartisan businesses agree legal restrictions on reproductive health care are bad for business). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Brief for the states of New York, California, Arizona, et al., as amici curiae in support of appellees (No. 23-0629, affirming 'The district court appropriately granted and tailored the temporary injunction to protect the interests of Texas residents and amici's residents who may temporarily be in Texas.'). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Opinion and concurring opinions (No. 23-0629, vacating the trial court's order; asserting that doctors who denied defendants' abortions for fear of civil penalties or criminal prosecution were “simply wrong in that legal assessment"; SB 8, abortion exemptions). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) | ||
State of Texas, et al. v. Amanda Zurawski, et al.; Plaintiffs-Appellees' response brief (No. 23-0629, seeking clarification of Texas's medical exception to its abortion bans). (Link Type: Texas Court Case) |