Related documents Search history | Help
[ clip 4 years after George Floyd's death, has corporate America kept promises to Black America? ]
8 document(s) related
Misc. items: 8
|
Legal Documents
|
Clips |
|
|---|---|---|
Crystal Bolduc v. Amazon.com Inc.; Class-action complaint (No. 4:22-cv-00615, claiming defendant's delivery-service-partners program, which awards a $10,000 bonus to partners who are black, Latino, or Native American, is racially discriminatory). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Crystal Bolduc v. Amazon.com Inc.; Memorandum opinion and order (No. 4:22-cv-00615, asserting that because plaintiff failed to demonstrate that she is suffering from an injury that is “concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent,” she lacks standing to move forward with her racial discrimination case). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Do No Harm v. Pfizer Inc.; Opinion (No. 23-15, affirming the district court’s dismissal of Do No Harm’s claims that a Pfizer fellowship program unlawfully excludes white and Asian-American applicants on the basis of race). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Nathan Roberts and Freedom Truck Dispatch LLC, v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, et al.; Plaintiffs' class-action complaint (No. 1:23-cv-01597-PAG, claiming that defendants engage in racial discrimination by offering $25,000 grants to ten black-owned small businesses to use toward the purchase of a commercial vehicle). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Nathan Roberts, et al., v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, et al.; Memorandum of opinion and order (No. 1:23-cv-01597-PAG, dismissing racial discrimination case against defendants because plaintiffs lack standing to seek relief concerning past grants they didn't apply for or unnamed, hypothetical future grants). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
National Center for Public Policy Research v. Howard Schultz, et al.; Order granting motions to dismiss (No. 2:22-cv-00267-SAB, dismissing plaintiffs case claiming that certain Starbucks initiatives are racially discriminatory and alleging that company leaders breached their fiduciary duties by adopting them). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College; Opinion (No. 20-1199, ending affirmative action in college admissions; overruling Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
|
Articles / Press Releases
|
Clips |
|
Trends in representation of Black leaders. (Link Type: Article) | ||