Related documents Search history | Help
[ clip What the Supreme Court's ruling on a popular abortion medication means for Texans ]
5 document(s) related
Misc. items: 5
|
Laws & Rules
|
Clips |
|
|---|---|---|
Texas Health and Safety Code ch. 170A, Performance of abortion. (Link Type: Texas Law) |
27 | |
|
Legal Documents
|
Clips |
|
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al., v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, et al., v. Danco Laboratories, LLC; Opinion (No. 23-10362, restoring U.S. Food and Drug Administration's mifepristone approval but upholding lower court's block of new FDA regulations broadening access to the drug; abortion medication). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al., v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, et al.; Memorandum opinion and order (No. 2:22-CV-00223-Z, suspending FDA's approval of mifepristone, contending the agency lacked legal authority to approve and enable access, and blocking new FDA regulations broadening access to the drug; abortion medication). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Food and Drug Administration, et al., v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al., and Danco Laboratories, LLC v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al.; Opinion (Nos. 23-235 and 23-236, plaintiff's lack standing to challenge FDA's actions regarding regulation of mifepristone). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
State of Missouri, et al., v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, et al.; Complaint (No. 2:22-cv-00223-Z, states of Missouri, Kansas, and Idaho, which have standing that plaintiff doctors lack, intervening and challenging FDA's approval to provide mifepristone access). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||