Related documents Search history  |  Help

42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA)). (Link Type: Federal Law)
See: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1395dd
In U.S. Code
By U.S. Congress
Publication Date: October 21, 1986
Library Location: LAW-FED

Mike Moyle, et al., v. United States and Idaho v. United States; Per curiam opinion (Nos. 23-726 and 23-727, vacating stays and dismissing cases as improvidently granted, sending them back to court of appeals; Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) and Idaho's Defense of Life Act; abortion). (Link Type: Federal Court Case)
See: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-726_6jgm.pdf
By U.S. Supreme Court
Publication Date: June 27, 2024

State of Idaho v. United States; Docket (No. 23-727, whether the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) trumps Idaho's Defense of Life Act; abortion). (Link Type: Federal Court Case)
See: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-727.html
By U.S. Supreme Court
Publication Date: January 5, 2024

State of Texas v. Xavier Becerra, et al.; Memorandum opinion and order (No. 5:22-cv-00185, the U.S. government cannot enforce federal guidance in Texas requiring emergency room doctors to perform abortions if necessary to stabilize emergency room patients; Reinforcement of EMTALA [Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act] Obligations specific to patients who are pregnant or are experiencing pregnancy loss). (Link Type: Federal Court Case)
See: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.365015/gov.uscourts.txnd.365015.73.0.pdf
By U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division
Publication Date: August 23, 2022

State of Texas v. Xavier Becerra, et al.; State of Texas's original complaint (No. 5:22-cv-00185, challenging federal guidance regarding abortions; Reinforcement of EMTALA [Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act] Obligations specific to patients who are pregnant or are experiencing pregnancy loss). (Link Type: Federal Court Case)
See: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.365015/gov.uscourts.txnd.365015.1.0.pdf
By U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division
Publication Date: July 14, 2022

State of Texas, et al., v. Xavier Becerra, et al.; Published opinion (No. 23-10246, federal guidance regarding the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) cannot be used to require emergency care abortions in Texas or by members of two anti-abortion groups, including the the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, and the Christian Medical & Dental Associations). (Link Type: Federal Court Case)
See: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca5.212720/gov.uscourts.ca5.212720.134.1.pdf
By U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Publication Date: January 2, 2024

United States v. State of Idaho, Memorandum decision and order (No.1:22-cv-00329-BLW, Idaho Code § 18-622 making it a felony to perform an abortion violates Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd). (Link Type: Federal Court Case)
View report
By United States District Court for the District of Idaho
Publication Date: August 24, 2022

Reinforcement of Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) obligations specific to patients who are pregnant or are experiencing pregnancy loss, letter of HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra (must provide abortion services if the life of the mother is at risk). (Link Type: Agency Document)
See: https://lrl.texas.gov/scanned/archive/2022/49674.pdf
By U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Publication Date: July 11, 2022