Related documents Search history | Help
[ clip Again and again, U.S. Supreme Court slaps down 5th Circuit ]
10 document(s) related
Misc. items: 10
|
Legal Documents
|
Clips |
|
|---|---|---|
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al., v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, et al., v. Danco Laboratories, LLC; Opinion (No. 23-10362, restoring U.S. Food and Drug Administration's mifepristone approval but upholding lower court's block of new FDA regulations broadening access to the drug; abortion medication). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al., v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, et al.; Memorandum opinion and order (No. 2:22-CV-00223-Z, suspending FDA's approval of mifepristone, contending the agency lacked legal authority to approve and enable access, and blocking new FDA regulations broadening access to the drug; abortion medication). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, et al., v. Community Financial Services Association of America, LTD, et al.; Opinion (No. 23-448, overturning appeals court ruling; the funding structure of the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is actually constitutional). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Food and Drug Administration, et al., v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al., and Danco Laboratories, LLC v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al.; Opinion (Nos. 23-235 and 23-236, plaintiff's lack standing to challenge FDA's actions regarding regulation of mifepristone). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Free Speech Coalition, et al. v. Ken Paxton; Order (No. 23A925 or 23-1122, denying the application for emergency stay to put HB 1181, 88th R.S. on hold). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Merrick B. Garland, et al. v. Michael Cargill; Opinion (No. 22-976, claiming bump stocks do not convert semi-automatic rifles into machine guns; asserting the Trump administration didn’t have the authority to ban bump stocks). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Securities and Exchange Commission v. George R. Jarkesy, Jr., et al.; Opinion (No. 22-859, finding the SEC violated individuals’ right to a jury trial by assessing penalties through an in-house administrative court). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States of America v. Zackey Rahimi; Opinion (No. 21-11001, related to prohibiting the possession of firearms by someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States v. Zackey Rahimi; Opinion (No. 22-915, upholding federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), prohibiting individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a firearm). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Vivek H. Murthy, et al., v. State of Missouri, et al.; Opinion (No. 23-411, finding that defendants did not have standing to sue over alleged social media censorship during the COVID-19 pandemic). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||