Related documents Search history | Help
[ clip If Lawsuit Ends Federal Mandates on Birth Control Coverage, States Will Have the Say ]
5 document(s) related
Misc. items: 5
|
Laws & Rules
|
Clips |
|
|---|---|---|
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010) (health insurance reform, 'Obamacare'). (Link Type: Federal Law) |
1616 | |
|
Legal Documents
|
Clips |
|
Braidwood Management Inc., et al. v. Xavier Becerra, et al.; Amici curiae brief of 20 health policy experts, the American Public Health Association, and the Association of American Medical Colleges in support of defendants' motion for summary judgment (No. 4:20-cv-00283-O, ACA's preventative services mandate violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act; previously Kelley, et al. v. Azar, et al.) (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Braidwood Management Inc., et al. v. Xavier Becerra, et al.; Complaint - class action (No. 4:20-cv-00283, asserting that agency-issued preventive-care mandates are unlawful and that mandates to cover contraception and PrEP drugs violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act; previously Kelley, et al. v. Azar, et al.). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Braidwood Management Inc., et al. v. Xavier Becerra, et al.; Memorandum opinion and order (No. 4:20-cv-00283-O, agency-issued preventive-care mandates are unlawful and that mandates to cover contraception and PrEP drugs violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act; previously Kelley, et al. v. Azar, et al.) (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Braidwood Management Inc., et al., v. Xavier Becerra, et al.; Final judgment (Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-00283-O, agency-issued preventive-care mandates are unlawful and that mandates to cover contraception and PrEP drugs violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||