Related documents Search history  | Help
[ clip Supreme Court justices defining Texas, themselves ]
14 document(s) related
Texas Bills & Amendments: 1
Misc. items: 13
| Texas Bills / Amendments | Caption | Clips |
|---|---|---|
| 89th 2nd Called Session | ||
| HB 4 | Relating to the composition of the districts for the election of members of the United States House of Representatives from the State of Texas. | 127 |
|
Federal and State Bills
|
Clips |
|
|---|---|---|
A.B. 604, 2025-2026 R.S., Election Rigging Response Act. (Other State Bill) |
22 | |
|
Legal Documents
|
Clips |
|
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission; Opinion (No. 08-205, political action committees/super PACs, corporate political spending, campaign finance). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
David Tangipa, et al., and United States of America, v. Gavin Newsom and Shirley Weber; United States' complaint in intervention (No. 2:25-cv-10616, Trump administration joining lawsuit challenging California’s new congressional map after passage of Proposition 50; California AB 604, 2025 redistricting). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Greg Abbott, et al., v. League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), et al.; Opinion and dissenting opinion (No. 25A608, restoring the congressional map created by HB 4, 89-2, redistricting). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), et al., v. Greg Abbott, et al.; Dissent from the memorandum opinion and order granting preliminary injunction (No. 3:21-cv-00259, mid-decade congressional redistricting map, HB 4, 89th 2nd C.S.). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), et al., v. Greg Abbott, et al.; Memorandum opinion and order granting preliminary injunction (No. 3:21-cv-00259, preliminarily enjoining Texas from using the mid-decade congressional redistricting map, HB 4, 89th 2nd C.S.). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Robert A. Rucho, et al. v. Common Cause, et al.; Opinion and dissenting opinion (No. 18-422, federal courts can't prevent state legislators from redistricting in ways that benefit them; North Carolina partisan gerrymandering). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Shelby County, Alabama v. Eric H. Holder, Jr. et al.; Opinion (No. 12-96, striking down Voting Rights Act of 1965, sec. 5; allowing states to enforce voter identification laws). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Terry Petteway, et al. v. Galveston County, Texas, et al.; En banc opinion (No. 23-40582, separate minority groups cannot “aggregate their populations” when challenging potentially discriminatory congressional maps, and each group's case must be analyzed separately; redistricting, overruling Campos v. City of Baytown, 840 F.2d 1240, 1244 (5th Circ. 1988); coalition districts). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Vieth v. Jubelirer, President of the Pennsylvania Senate; Opinion (No. 02-1580; political gerrymandering). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
|
Articles / Press Releases
|
Clips |
|
Has the Supreme Court become just another political branch? Public perceptions of court approval and legitimacy in a post-Dobbs world. (Link Type: Article) | ||
|
Other
|
Clips |
|
Letter to Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon, RE: Disagreeing with the U.S. Department of Justice's assessment which claims four Democratic congressional districts in Texas are unconstitutional racial gerrymanders (redistricting, SB 6, 87th 3rd C.S., PLAN C2193). (Link Type: Letter) | ||
Letter to Governor Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton, RE: Unconstitutional race-based congressional districts (flagging four left-leaning Texas congressional seats and raising concerns over the legality of their racial makeup; redistricting, SB 6, 87th 3rd C.S., PLAN C2193). (Link Type: Letter) | ||
