6 total clips found; Fitered rows : {data.filteredRows} found with filters [ report = Tyson Timbs v. Indiana, Opinion (No. 17-1091, finding the Eighth Amendment excessive fines clause is a protection applicable to the states under the 14th Amendment due process clause). ]

 Clear All

Select articles to view

Print	Headline	Newspaper	Columnist	Date	Related Links	Subjects
	POINT Civil Forfeiture: Reasonable limits are needed for asset-seizure practice that has been ‘turbocharged’ in recent decades	Houston Chronicle	Skorup, J.	04/12/2019	3 doc(s)	Asset forfeiture; Fines; Supreme Court arguments and decisions, U.S.
	COUNTERPOINT Civil Forfeiture: Scant federal case law, lack of high court guidance mean Timbs decision won’t have significant impact	Houston Chronicle	Soronen, L.	04/12/2019	4 doc(s)	Asset forfeiture; Supreme Court arguments and decisions, U.S.
	Fee ruling may curb local law spending	Houston Chronicle	Ketterer, S.	03/11/2019	4 doc(s)	Asset forfeiture; Burton, Konni; Ginsburg, Ruth Bader; Harris County Sheriff's Office; Law enforcement; Supreme Court arguments and decisions, U.S.; Thompson, Senfronia
	Asset forfeiture is tyranny, and fortunately the Supreme Court noticed	Dallas Morning News	Giovanetti, T.	03/03/2019	4 doc(s)	Asset forfeiture; Burton, Konni; Supreme Court arguments and decisions, U.S.
	SCOTUS: ‘Excessive fines’ ban applies to states	Austin American Statesman	Sherman, M.	02/21/2019	3 doc(s)	Asset forfeiture; Fines; Supreme Court arguments and decisions, U.S.
	Justices limit power of states, localities to seize property	Houston Chronicle	Barnes, R.	02/21/2019	5 doc(s)	Asset forfeiture; Fines; Supreme Court arguments and decisions, U.S.