Related documents Search history  | Help
[ clip COUNTERPOINT Civil Forfeiture: Scant federal case law, lack of high court guidance mean Timbs decision won’t have significant impact ]
4 document(s) related
Reports: 1
Misc. items: 3
Reports
|
Clips |
|
---|---|---|
Focus report: lawmakers may consider proposed changes to civil asset forfeiture. (Link Type: Report) |
5 | |
Legal Documents
|
Clips |
|
Curtis T. Lovelace v. People of the State of Illinois; Petition for a writ of certiorari (Case no. 18-809 (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
Tyson Timbs v. Indiana, Opinion (No. 17-1091, finding the Eighth Amendment excessive fines clause is a protection applicable to the states under the 14th Amendment due process clause). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) | ||
United States v. Hosep Krikor Bajakajian; Opinion (Case no. 96-1487, civil asset forfeiture). (Link Type: Federal Court Case) |