Related documents Search history  |  Help

[ clip COUNTERPOINT Civil Forfeiture: Scant federal case law, lack of high court guidance mean Timbs decision won’t have significant impact ]

4 document(s) related     Reports: 1     Misc. items: 3

Reports
Clips
Focus report: lawmakers may consider proposed changes to civil asset forfeiture. (Link Type: Report)
See: https://hro.house.texas.gov/pdf/focus/CAF.pdf
By House Research Organization (HRO) / Texas House of Representatives
Publication Date: October 29, 2018
  5
Legal Documents
Clips
Curtis T. Lovelace v. People of the State of Illinois; Petition for a writ of certiorari (Case no. 18-809 (Link Type: Federal Court Case)
See: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-809/77527/20181226112153874_18-__PetitionForAWritOfCert...
By U.S. Supreme Court
Publication Date: December 24, 2018
   
Tyson Timbs v. Indiana, Opinion (No. 17-1091, finding the Eighth Amendment excessive fines clause is a protection applicable to the states under the 14th Amendment due process clause). (Link Type: Federal Court Case)
See: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1091_5536.pdf
By U.S. Supreme Court
Publication Date: February 20, 2019
  6
United States v. Hosep Krikor Bajakajian; Opinion (Case no. 96-1487, civil asset forfeiture). (Link Type: Federal Court Case)
See: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/96-1487P.ZS
By U.S. Supreme Court
Publication Date: June 22, 1998